Caveat: TLIs not TLAs

How is it at all possible that I reached the age of 46 without realizing that there are pedants out there who like to distinguish between the concepts of acronym (a pronounciable grouping of first letters and sounds, e.g. NASA) and initialism (an unpronounciable grouping of first letters, e.g. FBI)? And to think that I was a literature major!

According to the wiktionary, there are 3 meanings for acronym:

1. An abbreviation formed by (usually initial) letters taken from a word or series of words, that is itself pronounced as a word, such as RAM, radar, or scuba; sometimes contrasted with initialism.
2.  A pronounceable word formed from the beginnings (letter or syllable) of other words and thus representing the phrase so formed, e.g. Benelux = the countries Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg considered as a political or economic whole.
3.  Any abbreviation so formed, regardless of pronunciation, such as TNT, IBM, or XML.

I always, always thought that definition 3 was the main defnition. For me, it was the only definition. But a usage note says, "The third sense is often criticized by commentators who prefer the term initialism for abbreviations that are not pronounced like an ordinary word." So it turns out that these anonymous commentators would have judged me wrong, all these years.

My absolute favorite acronym, therefore, turns out to actually be an initialism (unless you are good at pronouncing the /tl/ cluster, as in the Nahuatl language): TLA = three-letter acronym. Properly speaking, it should instead be TLI = three-letter initialism. Somehow, it seems less compelling, that way. But that's just because it shakes up my long-held habit. I'll try to adapt.

Here's a lingering question, however. Some potential acronyms are nevertheless typically "pronounced" as initialisms. Anyone could say /ukla/ for UCLA, if they wanted (and, in fact, Spanish speakers generally do exactly that, for example), but people typically spell it out in English, U.C.L.A. So is it an acronym or an initialism?

What I'm listening to right now.

220px-Mona_Bone_Jakon_AlbumCat Stevens (AKA Yusuf Islam), "My Lady d'Arbanville." He looks so very 70's in that video.

But I've been realizing, when I heard it came around on the mp3 shuffle… Cat Stevens has been more consistently a part of my "life soundtrack" than any other composer or singer in my life – he was part of my parents' soundtrack when I was child growing up, he was a major component of my own listening, as an adolescent, and unlike other musical manias and fads I've had, he's always been on the short rotation. If I had to guess a single album that I've listened to more times than any other, it would almost undoubtedly be Mona Bone Jakon (the disturbing origin of this album title is slightly NSFW – interestingly, this latter term is an acronym [pardon me, initialism] which was being written about by Alan Jacobs at the Atlantic wherein I first learned of this aforementioned acronym/initialism distinction – thus, full circle).

Caveat: Stupid Chicken

I was reading the third story in my first grade [broken link! FIXME] A1 reader. It's about a little baby chick trying to cross a stream. The chick gets advice from a duck (swim!), a rabbit (hop across!), a bee (fly!), but she's very sad because she can't do these things. And then the mama hen comes along and says: just walk across the bridge!

Oh! There's a bridge… The chick says, "이렇게 쉬운 걸 가지고…" […like that, it's easy].

For some reason, I found this intensely funny. What a stupid chicken. Cute story.

A1 002

[Daily log: walking, 7 km]

Back to Top